Reading the Bible to My Son

I started a project where I tried to read the Bible to my son every night before bedtime. That’s it. We read one story and then discuss what it means. The next night we read the next story, and so on. We started with the Gospel of Luke, and now we are almost done reading through 1st and 2nd Chronicles (yes, you read that right). If it’s a late night and we don’t have much time, I will read to him one of the Psalms.

My son is pretty good at reading, so I sometimes have him follow my finger along while I am reading to him. Of course he is 6 years old so he can get a little wiggly. (His sister just turned 3, so she gets even more of a pass.) I have had to learn to let go of expectations of perfection on his part. I just have to trust that there will be a cumulative effect in his spiritual formation.

Why have I decided to do this? Because it is literally the easiest thing to do. Because VeggieTales is not a substitute for parental instruction. Because the notion of family worship isn’t something that I grew up with but sounds intriguing to me.

Mostly, I have become convicted of my role as the primary spiritual teacher for my son and daughter. Television and movies will teach them things opposite of what the Bible teaches. Secular teachers will—in the very best case scenario—teach things that are indifferent to Christianity. Even Sunday school teachers and AWANA will be at best supplemental sources of instruction.

Only I and my wife have the primary task of teaching our children diligently what the Word of God says (Deuteronomy 6:7). Only I and my wife are charged with training up these children in the way they should go (Proverbs 22:6). Only I and my wife are given the divine responsibility to raise these children in the instruction of the Lord (Ephesians 6:4).

Will I miss some reading times? I already have. Have I flubbed the explanation of the passage? Yes, both because there were times I did not fully understand the point of the story I was reading, and also because there were times I did have an accurate understanding but employed a truncated explanation. Will my children automatically become always-obedient, perpetually-compliant demi-angels? Ha. Will this practice ensure the eternal salvation of my children? No.

And yet… For His own sovereign purposes, God saw fit to call both me and my wife to repentance and faith, and to become the parents of these particular children. I teach my children what the Bible says, not out of a mechanistic sense of inevitability, but out of gratitude for my own salvation, out of obedience to my Lord, and out of hope that my children will grow to full maturity: knowledge, reproof, correction, training in righteousness (2 Timothy 3:16).

Parents, if you aren’t already reading the Bible to your young children, please start. If your children are a bit older, find what works for your family and then do it. (Also, if you have more experience in this, please share your wisdom!) The Word of God is our only infallible rule for faith and practice, our Lord Jesus Christ deserves our full devotion and faithful service, and our children need their parents to explain what in life is most important.

As this photo reads, your most important disciples are sitting at your kitchen table.

Advertisements

My year of reading The Message

I have made a personal goal for myself to read through a different translation of the Bible each year for the last several years. So far, I have read “word-for-word” translations (e.g. NASB, ESV, NKJV) as well as translations that tend toward “thought-for-thought” renderings (e.g. NLT, NIV, NET). This year, I decided to read Eugene Peterson’s popular paraphrase of the Bible, “The Message.”

Side note 1: for those of my readers who might now question my salvation, fret not; I kept last year’s NASB on hand for comparison. Side note 2: when I began this project, I had no idea that Peterson was in the last year of his life (he died October 22, 2018).

Eugene Peterson wanted to make a version of the Bible that was readable, and in that goal, he was quite successful. I think that Peterson’s impetus was pastoral. His reasoning seemed to be that people want to read the Bible, but are often put off by the inherent murkiness of translation English. To me, I think the problem is deeper–that people do not, in their natural sinful state, want to read the Bible. But I digress.

As I indicated, the Message is eminently readable; it was written at a 4th-grade reading level, which makes it one of the easiest-to-read versions available. This readability is aided by its layout: single-column pages, no verse numbers, no study helps like cross-references. Only chapter numbers and section headers remain, and the only footnote indicated the longer ending of Mark. If I had to make a guess, I would say that the Message could be credited with popularizing the reader’s Bible format.

Peterson included his own introduction to each book of the Bible, which vary wildly in helpfulness. His introduction to Obadiah, for example, clarifies the background relationship between Israel and Edom. By contrast, his introduction to Micah rambles about the role of prophets in general, with little information pertinent to this particular book.

At the risk of overly generalizing, The Message works best for the narrative genre, gets fanciful on the poetic genre, and misses the mark on the didactic genre. The most effective portion might be Proverbs; Peterson clearly had a gift rewording pithy sayings. By the same token, his idiosyncratic rewording detracts from the Gospels, rendering certain portions unrecognizable.

At times, Peterson’s commitment to capturing the rhetorical affect of a passage simply undermines the intended meaning expressed in “word-for-word” translations; other times, he outright contradicts the original author’s intent. For example, in Joshua 10:14 the author remarks on God causing the sun to stand still at the battle of the valley of Aijalon. Here’s the NASB (note the bold portion of each rendering):

There was no day like that before it or after it, when the LORD listened to the voice of a man; for the LORD fought for Israel.

And here’s the Message:

There’s never been a day like that before or since—GOD took orders from a human voice! Truly, GOD fought for Israel.

To say that God “listened to the voice of a man” is not to diminish the ultimate sovereignty of God; to say that God “took orders from a human voice” comes close to denying God as the supreme authority over humanity.

Any Bible paraphrase, by its nature, reveals the theological leanings of its author. Despite his noble intentions of wanting people to read the Bible for themselves, Peterson has–however unintentionally–introduced his readers to a god of his own invention. At his memorial service, Peterson’s son asserted that his father only ever had one sermon throughout his life and ministry: God loves you. This “one sermon” reverberates through the pages of The Message. In its proper context, this is a right and true understanding of God. But divorced from other, more central truths like the sovereignty of God, this truth becomes a half-truth.

The Message is a decent-enough retelling of the story of the Bible (akin, in its own way, to “The Jesus Storybook Bible”). As a faithful version of the Bible, it falls short. Readability does not equal reliability. If you truly desire to know God in His fullness, and if you can’t read the original languages of the Bible, get a proper translation.

There is a shelf in our house dedicated exclusively to Bibles. From now on, I will no longer keep The Message on that shelf.

P.S. for a more in-depth review of The Message, read this: The Message is Not a Bible Translation: Peterson’s Philosophy

The so-called War on Christmas is actually a good thing

Last year, Kevin O’Brien, dean of the Jesuit School of Theology at Santa Clara University, posted a video sharing his thoughts on the so-called “war on Christmas.”

The video is less than three minutes long, but I am going to focus almost exclusively on one paragraph.

Around the 0:20 mark, O’Brien claims, “I don’t think Jesus would care much about whether we say ‘Merry Christmas’ or not…” This seems to be a reasonable position. Granted, he leaves undefined whom he has in mind when he says “we,” whether he means Americans in general or Catholics/Christians in particular. But the larger point is understandable: in an increasingly secularized culture, identifying Christmas as the primary feature of the upcoming calendar may or may not reflect the broader opinions of our neighbors. (Indeed, Christians are never commanded in Scripture to celebrate Christmas.)

But the very first line of reasoning O’Brien uses to support his assertion is shockingly subversive of historic orthodox Christianity: “… because he was not concerned about promoting himself, but promoting what he called ‘the reign of God.’ This reign, this community of justice, peace, and love—that, to him, is more important than any title for himself.”

WHAT?!? Even from the mouth of a Catholic professor, I found myself stunned at the Biblical ignorance on display.

The foundational confession of the church is that Jesus is the Messiah/Christ, and since Christ means King and Jesus is God, then Jesus’ talk about the reign of God is about the reign of himself. Promoting the reign of God by definition means promoting himself.

By definition, only Christians recognize Jesus as Christ, which means that nonbelievers—so long as they remain nonbelievers—cannot recognize Jesus as Christ. To say “Merry Christmas” implies, at its most basic level, an acknowledgement that the Jesus whose birth we commemorate is the Christ. To say “Merry Christmas” is actually to make a claim unique to Christianity.

As fewer unbelievers say “Merry Christmas” even as a vestigial custom, this two-word phrase takes on a more distinctly Christian message than ever before. We need to realize that this seasonal greeting is our (still culturally acceptable) opportunity to confess Jesus as Lord. When Christians capitulate to the culture and automatically say “Happy Holidays” rather than “Merry Christmas,” in some small way we are cheating ourselves of an opportunity for evangelism. (Yes, I’m aware that the word “holiday” means holy day, but all different religions have their own holy days.)

The letter of 1 Peter is all about how Christians can thrive even in the midst of suffering and persecution for their faith. If we Christians in 21st-century USA cower in the face of a few sneers and snide remarks, how will we ever endure when actual persecution comes our way?!?

So this year, when someone says to me “Happy Holidays,” I will accept it as the polite greeting they intend it to be. But when I say “Merry Christmas,” I will not be merely offering a polite greeting.

Let us make the most of every opportunity we can to declare that Jesus is the Christ—at Christmas and every other time of the year.

This vs. That

First things first.

This post is inspired by the Statement on Social Justice and the Gospel that stirred and spurred much discussion among Christians on social media. (By the way, I read and signed it, and I would encourage you to do the same.)

There are a lot of differences between Christians. It can be easy to distort such conflicts as simply an Either/Or binary. Some try to assuage the “other side” by asserting that the Either/Or must instead be understood as Both/And.

But a lot of these differences—at least between true Christians—are differences of emphasis. As I have thought about many internal conversations between Christians of various stripes, I theorize: Some issues truly are Either/Or. Some issues truly are Both/And. But too often overlooked is the possibility that the issue is actually what I have come to call First/Second. This is literally what it means to “prioritize”—to determine what comes first.

Look through this list and see if a prioritizing of the issues between “first” and “second” one way or the other might help to clarify both the division and the unity of various believers.

  • Believing the right things (orthodoxy) vs. living the right way (orthopraxy)
  • Preaching the gospel vs. applying the gospel
  • Worshiping God vs. serving God
  • Emphasizing God’s judgment against sin vs. emphasizing God’s mercy on sinners
  • Scrutinizing what is said (substance) vs. scrutinizing how it is said (optics)
  • Focusing on individual evil (contra righteousness) vs. focusing on societal evil (contra justice)
  • Tending the spiritual needs of people vs. tending the physical needs of people
  • Training up Christians (discipleship) vs. proclaiming the good news to unbelievers (evangelism)
  • Loving God vs. loving one’s neighbor

As I understand each of these vs. statements (and this list could be much longer), each side presents an important issue, and each side offers a complementary truth to its counterpart, but the second item in each pair seems to be contingent on its neighbor. In some way, I believe the items mentioned first must come first, and only then can the second items build on the foundation of the first.

But here I confess, I could very well be wrong. Maybe I have framed this handful of issues unfairly. I don’t think so, I hope not, but it IS possible. And I do not want to be wrong. So, I depend on you, faithful readers, to correct me if I err.

Or maybe I’m right.

Or maybe we’re both wrong, and the truth lies elsewhere.

Pastor Alistair Begg is fond of saying, “The main things are the plain things, and the plain things are the main things.” Similarly, my dad likes to say, “The main thing is to keep the main thing, the main thing.” Brothers and sisters, here’s what I believe is the plainest, “main-est” thing of all: Jesus is Lord.

So, whether you are on “my side” or “the other side” of the debate, or even somewhere in the middle…

Let’s all get our priorities straight.

A brief word on politics and Christianity

For the most part, I want this blog to be a chance for me to encourage people to fix their eyes on Jesus. For that reason, most of my posts will be exclusively biblical or theological in nature. But for this post, I am going to say something political. Here it is:

The Christian church and the United States of America are two different things.

I know that may sound obvious, but I have noticed a general tendency for people to blur the distinction. I am both a Christian and an American; as such, my duties as both a Christian and an American are distinct. What I briefly offer below are a few reminders and admonitions to both groups with whom I share an affinity.  You may notice that each of the following sets are contrasting in some way; that is intentional.

Fellow Americans, we participate in a representative democracy.
Fellow Christians, we are subjects of a spiritual theocracy.

Fellow Americans, our government must protect the natural rights of every citizen and execute justice on law-breakers.
Fellow Christians, we must recognize that we are all sinners before God, yet His mercy is open to any who repent and believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and the atoning sacrifice who took our sins upon Himself.

Fellow Americans, it is for our good that we tolerate those among us who believe differently than ourselves.
Fellow Christians, it is for our good that we love those among us who vote differently than ourselves.

Fellow Americans, let us be slow to believe whatever latest news story merely because it confirms our worst fears about “the other.”
Fellow Christians, let us be quick to believe all that God has proclaimed in His holy, true, clear, authoritative, and sufficient Word.

Fellow Americans, let us be open to investigating which (if any!) of the available political options would be most beneficial for our nation.
Fellow Christians, let us always trust that the Spirit of Truth promised by Jesus will guide us to know the truth for ourselves, to obey our Heavenly Master, and to love our fellow believers.

Fellow Americans, it is for our good that our nation elects different leaders—mayors and governors, congresspersons and presidents—on a regular basis.
Fellow Christians, it is for our good that our Lord and Savior, Jesus the Messiah, will never, ever, EVER be dethroned.

Fellow Americans, it may behoove us to realize humbly that not all of our problems are political.
Fellow Christians, it befits us to proclaim boldly the gospel of Jesus Christ as the healing balm to every painful situation and every broken heart.

Fellow Americans, let us never try to remake our country into a theocracy; when we try to do so, trouble always follows.
Fellow Christians, let us never try to remake the church into a democracy; when we try to do so, trouble always follows.

Lastly, the church and the USA should be contrasted in one more important way: only one of them is eternal.

“To Him who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb, be blessing and honor and glory and dominion forever and ever.”

Revelation 5:13b, NASB

All My #BibleMonth Summaries

If you follow me on Twitter or are my friend on Facebook, you might have seen me do something strange last month. I decided (somewhat impulsively) to piggyback on the hashtag #BibleMonth—used by the SiriusXM CCM station The Message during the month of March—and summarize each book of the Bible in 140 characters or fewer.

As with any work of creativity, or any attempt at Biblical commentary, I am not completely satisfied with all the results. I produced each of these one at a time, though in some respects I wish I had composed all of them prior to posting. Some entries are better than others, and the style from one entry to the next is at times inconsistent. However, each one was produced with the intent that it would be as accessible and accurate as possible in the condensing of the content or the distillation of the themes of the book.

Without further ado, I present the content of all 63 summaries (I recombined the books of 1-2 Samuel, 1-2 Kings, and 1-2 Chronicles), minus the repeated closing hashtag #BibleMonth.

  • Genesis: God creates the world; man rebels against God, curses ensue; God promises blessing to/through Abraham, Isaac and Jacob
  • Exodus: God appoints Moses to lead Israel out of slavery in Egypt, establishes His law-covenant to distinguish His people
  • Leviticus: God sets laws for Israel’s holiness to mirror His own re: offerings, priesthood, feasts, and community life
  • Numbers: God readies Israel to enter Promised Land; Israel balks, forced to wander 40 years until next generation can enter
  • Deuteronomy: God through Moses reminds Israel of His law-covenant wherein obedience leads to life, disobedience to death
  • Joshua: God leads Israel through Joshua to conquer and settle in the Promised Land; Joshua warns about future disobedience
  • Judges: God punishes Israel through its enemies, sets up judges to rescue for a time; without a king, Israel spirals down
  • Ruth: God provides for an Israelite widow and her Moabite daughter-in-law, makes them part of the lineage of King David
  • 1-2 Samuel: God appoints faithful prophet Samuel, rejects sinful King Saul, blesses faithful King David but allows family drama
  • 1-2 Kings: God grants wisdom to King Solomon; Israel secedes from Judah; idolatry leads to downfall of both kingdoms
  • 1-2 Chronicles: God gives King David a dynasty and Levitical priests a temple; in exile Israel is given hope of restoration
  • Ezra: God brings Israel back out of exile to rebuild His temple; priest Ezra still finds lingering moral problems
  • Nehemiah: God inspires Nehemiah to rebuild the wall around Jerusalem; Nehemiah’s moral reforms have limited effect
  • Esther: God elevates a Jewish orphan to be queen of Persia so she may rescue her people from genocide; new festival Purim
  • Job: God permits Satan to afflict Job; Job and his friends argue about God’s power and goodness; God Himself sets Job straight
  • Psalms: God listens to His people in their praises, laments, requests, and other expressions of trust in His sovereign rule
  • Proverbs: God has ordered His creation according to the principles of wisdom, which are knowable to those who fear Him
  • Ecclesiastes: God frustrates human attempts to find meaning or satisfaction apart from fearing Him and keeping His commandments
  • Song of Songs: God ordains sexual love to be a special blessing for marriage as seen through the eyes of a newlywed couple
  • Isaiah: God rules over all, will judge all rebellion, and will establish His perfect rule over His people through His Servant
  • Jeremiah: God judges His people for their breaking His law-covenant, hinting at a future new covenant and a renewed people
  • Lamentations: God loves His people with an unending love even in the midst of His righteous judgment of their sin
  • Ezekiel: God condemns all sin yet graciously promises to restore His people so all may know that He is the LORD
  • Daniel: God proves His superiority by preserving His people in a hostile land and revealing His future perfect rule(r)
  • Hosea: God chooses His people fully aware that they will be faithless, pledges to restore them out of idolatry
  • Joel: God announces a “day of the LORD” when He will both devastate and deliver, blessing His people and judging their enemies
  • Amos: God holds all people accountable for their sin, pledges to destroy all sinfulness yet somehow also preserve His people
  • Obadiah: God pronounces judgment on the enemies of His people in contrast to the glorious future His people will enjoy
  • Jonah: God relents from judgment on those who repent and turn to Him, whether a pagan nation or a wayward prophet
  • Micah: God decries the flagrant sins of idolatry and injustice found in His people, ensures a King who will remove these evils
  • Nahum: God authorizes the destruction of the enemies of His people because they remain opposed to Him and His rule
  • Habakkuk: God uses wicked nations to His own purposes without excusing them from their wickedness; His people can still trust
  • Zephaniah: God declares the day of the LORD will wipe out all traces of rebellion against Himself; only humble worshipers left
  • Haggai: God rebukes His people for neglecting His temple, then promises an even greater sign of His presence among them
  • Zechariah: God foreshadows cataclysms and resistance that will precede the establishment of His appointed King-Priest
  • Malachi: God denounces all false piety in His people, admonishes them to ready themselves for the day of His coming
  • Matthew: Jesus confirms he is the promised Messianic King of Israel who supersedes the OT experts and the law-covenant
  • Mark: Jesus works miracles, teaches to prove his authority; rejected by some but filling his followers with awe
  • Luke: Jesus proves his greatness through his miracles and teaching on his journey to Jerusalem; the humble trust in him
  • John: Jesus performs 7 signs and makes 7 “I am” statements to prove He is the Christ, the Son of God in whom we may believe
  • Acts: Jesus sends his disciples to be his witnesses; Word of God spreads from Jerusalem to Rome via Peter and Paul
  • Romans: Jesus offers salvation through faith in himself to Jews and Gentiles; justification -> sanctification -> unity
  • 1 Corinthians: Jesus calls for unity in the church through shared faith in himself and shared obedience to himself
  • 2 Corinthians: Jesus certifies Paul as an apostle through his ministry and suffering; true Christians listen to his message
  • Galatians: Jesus rejects all attempts to reinstate Israel’s law-covenant which he has overridden by his new covenant
  • Ephesians: Jesus reconciles believers with God and unifies them through the gospel; church must uphold right preaching/living
  • Philippians: Jesus enables Christians to endure suffering with joy since he modeled humility and will complete his good work
  • Colossians: Jesus reigns supreme over all things, foremost the church; Christians submit to him, not earthly philosophies
  • 1 Thessalonians: Jesus orders his church by his word and the promise of his return; Christians live in a worthy manner till then
  • 2 Thessalonians: Jesus forbids misunderstandings of his return as excuses for idleness; Christians must speak and work well
  • 1 Timothy: Jesus appoints pastors over churches to guard the doctrine and guide the people; Christians imitate faithful elders
  • 2 Timothy: Jesus emboldens his messengers to trust in his word and speak despite opposition; Christians need faithful preaching
  • Titus: Jesus installs elders to teach sound doctrine and live holy lives so that believers may be equipped to do good deeds
  • Philemon: Jesus reorients relationships between Christians so that even a master and slave may fellowship as brothers
  • Hebrews: Jesus surpasses the OT messengers, priesthood, and sacrifices; Christians persevere in faith that he is better
  • James: Jesus grants wisdom to any who ask so that we may not only see our sin but also humble ourselves enough to obey
  • 1 Peter: Jesus sets his people apart from the rest of the world; Christians can endure suffering through their hope in him
  • 2 Peter: Jesus protects Christians from false teachers by reminding them of the Bible’s promises, especially re His return
  • 1 John: Jesus assures his people of salvation through negative examples and positive exhortations to believe, obey, and love
  • 2 John: Jesus distinguishes his people by their knowledge of truth and love for one another; Christians reject false teachers
  • 3 John: Jesus commends his people who show hospitality to faithful messengers of the gospel, proving they believe the message
  • Jude: Jesus keeps his people from apostasy by showing how self-destructive it has always been; Christians contend for the faith
  • Revelation: Jesus reveals he will conquer every foe and fulfill every Biblical promise at his return; Christians say, Amen, Come

And there you have it. I may revisit these at some later date and tweak them more to my perfectionist liking, but that will have to do for now. In the meantime, why not start thinking through how you would explain the Bible?

P.S. The Christian satirical news site The Babylon Bee has also presented their own summaries.

Who are the “Least of These?”

Matthew 25:40 NIV
Then the King will reply, “Truly I say to you, whatever you did to one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did it to me.”

I have seen many internet articles just on this one passage (Matthew 25:31-46). Unfortunately, such articles tend to be written by someone telling Christians that they are not acting like good Christians, chastising them for failing to live in accordance with this verse. They share an underlying indictment: “How dare you claim to care about people’s spiritual condition if you won’t take care of their physical needs?”

On its surface, this passage looks like it means that one’s eternal salvation is determined by one’s acts of compassion. Whenever we help the disenfranchised and the downtrodden of society, our entrance into heaven is all the more assured. On the other hand, as I heard one famous teacher describe it, Jesus will turn away at the final judgment from self-identifying Christians who failed to help the poor during their lifetime, saying, “I don’t want to hear it!”

You, dear reader, may currently hold this view. So did I. You may not even be aware that there might be a better way to understand Jesus’ words. Neither did I. (And, neither do some commentaries!)

We will almost always misapply what we misinterpret, and we will always misinterpret when we ignore literary context. There are several problems with the view described above, but I will only highlight what I think should be most obvious—this view ignores the very next words that Jesus says.

Jesus doesn’t just say, “the least of these” (yes, He just says “the least of these” in v 45, but He clearly has in mind the same people about whom He spoke in v 40); He says, “the least of these brothers of mine” (or “brothers and sisters of mine,” as in the translation above). Jesus doesn’t just throw out the term “the least of these” as a poetic catch-all for every disadvantaged person in existence. It seems to me that He has a particular subset of disadvantaged people in mind.

Question: Whom does Jesus consider “brothers and sisters?” Answer: His disciples in particular, and by extension all Christians in general*.

Matthew 12:46-50 ESV
While he was still speaking to the people, behold, his mother and his brothers stood outside, asking to speak to him. But he replied to the man who told him, “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?” And stretching out his hand toward his disciples, he said, “Here are my mother and my brothers! For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother.”

Jesus most closely identifies Himself with His closest followers (Matthew 10:40-42), those who “[do] the will of [His] Father in heaven,” which means they believe that He is indeed the One the Father has sent (John 6:28, 40). Jesus has already foretold that those who follow Him will be rejected and even suffer overt persecution on account of their faith in Jesus and their proclamation of the gospel (Matthew 5:10-12, 10:16-25). These persecutors, along with those who passively approve of their actions, are the goats Jesus describes.

Conversely, those who helped the disciples with their physical needs counteracted against the persecution and ostracism the disciples suffered. Their acts of compassion were also acts of solidarity; they outwardly showed that they inwardly accepted the disciples’ message (Mark 9:41). These sympathizers are the sheep Jesus describes. Thus, in accordance with the rest of Scripture, this passage teaches that entrance into Jesus’ eternal kingdom is contingent on accepting the message of the gospel in all its fullness and acting in accordance with its implications. Faith that works, and all that (James 2:14-17).

In short, this particular passage is NOT about charity in general nor what is called “social justice.” I do not write this to denigrate or discourage you if your current practice is based on what I consider a flawed interpretation. This is not a call to exclusivity but a reminder of priority, not turning a blind eye but having a biblical perspective. I am not suggesting that we never do anything to help people in general who have serious need unless they pass some sort of spiritual litmus test, but that we make sure we are doing the most important things first. I cannot tell you what you should do about the guy on the street corner, but I will encourage you to pay more attention to Christians who are suffering as a direct result of their faith in Jesus. It happens, even today, even here.

Those who stand against Christians, stand against Christ; those who stand with Christ, stand with Christians. Christians who are not currently being persecuted are to support those who are. Because whatever we do for a Christian—even the least important Christian you know—who is suffering for the sake of Christ, we do for Christ Himself, the Lord of all Christians.

* I would argue that whenever the word “brother” is used in the Bible, if it does not clearly mean “male sibling,” then it means either “fellow Israelite” (God’s Old Testament people) or “fellow Christian” (God’s New Testament people). Go ahead, try that definition in Leviticus 25 or I John 3:10-18.

EDIT: Since this particular passage has gained a lot of attention in recent days, I am including links to some other posts that also come to similar conclusions, approximately in order from earliest to most recent.